Tuesday, November 26, 2013

Is Chivalry Dead?

This question had been posed so many times in today's society, has chivalry died? If so, who killed it? I have a outlook on both these questions.

Chivalry in its rawest definition: The qualities idealized by knighthood, such as bravery, courtesy, honor, and gallantry toward women.

These days, young men seemed to have lost site of the aspect of "courting." They want sexual
relations as soon as they can get and cannot even fathom why they must but effort into getting it. Opening doors, actually getting to know someone, paying for dates, etc. are not event expected anymore. If a girl gets all of that, kudos to them, but its not in the requirements. But why is that?

I do not believe that chivalry is dead, I just believe it is on the verge of extinction. Who is killing it off? In my honest opinion, females are. What most females have yet to understand is a guy will do all that you allow him to do. If you raise your standards and expectations, a man will have to rise up to meet them. If you accept what they offer, even if you know you are worth more, you are agreeing that that is what you deserve.

They say every girl wants their knight in shining armor, but that's not all the way true. Every girl just wants to be treated like the world. But it is up to them to demand the respect they utterly crave. If chivalry is ever to make the immense comeback it deserves, it is truly up to women to recognize the need for them bring it back.

Monday, November 11, 2013

What is Loyalty?

Loyalty:  
  1. A feeling or attitude of devoted attachment and affection
  2. A feeling of faithfulness or allegiance
Contemplating on these definitions, how can one be truly loyal? Loyalty has always been a big issue in any relationship, whether friendship, romantic, or business. People have their own definitions of
loyalty, as well with their own portrayals on how it should be. So if loyalty is different to everyone, how can one live up to them all? And how you can expect someone to live up to a standard you yourself does not hold.

Growing up I was known as a "social butterfly," meaning that I just floated to each group/clique. I never really had one of my own. It was a given that some groups did not like each other, with whatever reason they had. I was never in tuned with the "hate by association" thing that seemed to be so popular. I believed in loyalty, yes, but I did not feel that it was necessary to dislike someone simply because my friend did. Some may disagree, and say loyalty means we have the same enemies. 

So in dealing with relationships of the friendship and romantic variety, whats constitutes disloyalty? Cheating, backstabbing, breaking of trust, etc.....sounds about right. But here's a question that I never got an answer to: Can you have two people in your life, who do not care for each other, and be loyal to both? Do you have to choose between the two to be truly loyal? 

The way I always dealt with this situation is simple: when I am with one, we do not speak on the other. How I mean this is: its A-Okay if you do not like my other friend, but you WILL NOT sit there and disrespect them in front of me, we will even even speak about them if you have nothing positive to say. That is how I define my loyalty. No one should feel comfortable blatantly disrespecting someone who you are close to. My Thoughts.

I do feel that some people take the loyalty to the EXTREMES. And this cause strife in certain situations. But all in all, loyalty is important in life, love, and relationships.

Saturday, November 2, 2013

Is Love Color Blind?

About half of Americans have said they have dated someone of the opposite race. While current generation is becoming more and more accepting of interracial couples, the pool of people dating interracially is uneven.

What factors determine whether or not someone would date someone not in their race? Well, the race of the individual is the the prevalent factor. The most least likely couple match is blacks and whites. Latinos and Asians are the most likely to engage in an interracial relationship. Studies show that youth from higher income families are less likely to date the opposite sex. This same statistic is reversed in Latinos. Better-off Latinos are more likely to interracially date than less affluent Latinos.

A majority of the people who are willing to interracially date are products of interracial love themselves. While its being more accepted, a lot of them rarely feel comfortable showing PDA in public. It is also more less likely that the relationship will end in marriage. Even with that statistic, interracial marriages are increasing.

I feel like America is a melting pot, and that is how it should be. Stigmas on interracial dating are highest in America while other cultures do not care as much. People should love love, not try to discredit it based off race. I support it. I endorse it. I embrace it.One should be comfortable with someone if they are in love. Love should be colorblind. Because Love is Love.



Wednesday, October 30, 2013

Unrequited Love

Every have that one person that caught eye, then captured your heart? That one who makes your heart flutter and blood run hot? Have you ever felt like you found the one you been looking for? Have you ever been in love? Have you ever been in love with someone who did not feel the same? There you have, unrequited love.

Unrequited love or one-sided love is love that is not openly reciprocated or understood as such. The beloved may or may not be aware of the admirer's deep and strong romantic affections.
To be in this situation is one of great strife and heartache. How does one stay in a situation knowing that all that you feel is only what you feel.

This situation can occur in two ways: the other person has no idea, or they do but do not feel the same.  Either way it up to the person to go in and evaluate the situation and do what is best for themselves. If you see that the situation is causing internal heartache, its best to separate yourself from the situation.

Monday, October 28, 2013

Trust Issues

What is Trust? According to Webster, trust is an assured reliance on the character, ability, strength, or truth of someone or something. With that said, is it possible to hold a strong relationship with someone when you are not sure on their character or word?

Any relationship, whether it be amicable, business, love or etc. should be based off trust. Its a foundation for which gives any relationship to grow, to prosper, and to develop into something real. How can you have something real if you do not even believe that the someone you are trying to build it with is real? Or, are they real but you can not come to the belief that they are real?

Trust issues really cause a weakness in a relationship. It can really tear apart what two people have potential to have. Many trust issues come from past relationships. Past betrayals in friendships, romantic relationships, or business relationships can truly hinder how a person sees everyone. They say that the worst part about betrayal is that it never comes from an enemy. When such situations happen, people like to shut everyone out for fear of being hurt, or repetition of a past situation.  

My take on trust issues, while everyone has their reservations about opening up and trusting people, one should always start off on a clean slate. Give someone a chance instead of always dismissing people. You could be missing out on your blessing!

Wednesday, October 16, 2013

Are Titles Necessary?


What defines a relationship? The title or the people within it? Because people fail to consider this question is where the battle truly comes from. Thats what a title does right? Define a relationship? So why are so many people afraid to come out and define the relationships for which they are in? My answer: Responsibility. With a title, comes the responsibility for which that title possess.

The generation we live in have become so complacent and at ease with just going with the flow. They
feel the same for relationships they are. "It is what it is", "We don't need to define this", "Titles messes things up" are all phrases used to counteract a partner's need for a definition of what the two posses between themselves. And why is this? I simply feel it is because people are simply afraid of the responsibility of possessing a title. Honestly, it is not even the title that ruin things. The expectations people have once a title is placed is what causes the issues.

So....whats the person of a title anyway? One word: Security. People, me included, like to know what they are getting into, what they need to expect, and how to react to certain situations. If we're just friends, we're just friends. But if we are involved, we are not just friends. We're not "just cool" or "just hanging out." Inviting the term "boyfriend/girlfriend, wife/husband, etc." comes with being seclusive, commitment, and security.

If things have evolved to a certain level and a partner is convinced that its time to define things, and the other should not, what to do here? Honestly, the answer to the necessity of titles belongs to the people who decide to engage in a relationship. If the two are both happy, then that is on them. Most
times the requirement of a title comes from trying to prove something to society and the people around us. At the end of the day, do whats comfortable for YOU. Look at Oprah, she's been with her mate Stedman for over 20 years and have proclaimed she will never be married. Her mate Stedman is okay with it, and their happy. Isn't that all that matters?

To each its own. 
[It may not be titles that causes the issues in relationships] It’s the change that occurs in individuals because of their perspective on what the title means that causes issues”
Read more at http://necolebitchie.com/2009/09/18/do-titles-screw-up-a-relationship/#L7cTFxEuAJhLbpM4.99
It may not be titles that causes the issues in relationships] It’s the change that occurs in individuals because of their perspective on what the title means that causes issues
Read more at http://necolebitchie.com/2009/09/18/do-titles-screw-up-a-relationship/#L7cTFxEuAJhLbpM4.99
It may not be titles that causes the issues in relationships] It’s the change that occurs in individuals because of their perspective on what the title means that causes issues
Read more at http://necolebitchie.com/2009/09/18/do-titles-screw-up-a-relationship/#L7cTFxEuAJhLbpM4.99
It may not be titles that causes the issues in relationships] It’s the change that occurs in individuals because of their perspective on what the title means that causes issues
Read more at http://necolebitchie.com/2009/09/18/do-titles-screw-up-a-relationship/#L7cTFxEuAJhLbpM4.99
It may not be titles that causes the issues in relationships] It’s the change that occurs in individuals because of their perspective on what the title means that causes issues
Read more at http://necolebitchie.com/2009/09/18/do-titles-screw-up-a-relationship/#L7cTFxEuAJhLbpM4.99
It may not be titles that causes the issues in relationships] It’s the change that occurs in individuals because of their perspective on what the title means that causes issues
Read more at http://necolebitchie.com/2009/09/18/do-titles-screw-up-a-relationship/#L7cTFxEuAJhLbpM4.99
It may not be titles that causes the issues in relationships] It’s the change that occurs in individuals because of their perspective on what the title means that causes issues
Read more at http://necolebitchie.com/2009/09/18/do-titles-screw-up-a-relationship/#L7cTFxEuAJhLbpM4.99

Wednesday, October 2, 2013

Social Media within Relationships

Social Media is gradually invading people's lives. It has taken the way we communicate with each to new heights and new lows. It has especially had an impact on how we come together in the real world. Because social media is so fast and instant, people often take the easy road out when communicating. It is also such easy access into people's lives. This creates problems in everyday life and especially in romantic relationships.

You are tweeting or posting random thoughts on the web and suddenly, your ex responds to it. Not thinking about it, you reply back. Suddenly you find yourself engaged in a full, public conversation for everyone to see. Your current significant other sees it and is infuriated. What do you do? How do you explain? This is only an example of one of the many problems that can occur.  Social media fuels jealousy simply because things can become misconstrued over the web. A like on Instagram. A Retweet on Twitter. A Post on the Facebook Wall. All these open forms of communication heightens insecurities that may already lie within the relationship.

People also let so much of their live be publicized on social media, that there's no privacy left. And for the ones that choose not to post every little thing, their significant other has doubts on the seriousness of their relationship. Discretion is looked at as being secretive or sneaky. "Why wont you update your relationship status?" "Why don't you want to post a picture of us?" These are things that get asked when one chooses not to show the world wide web about their life.

Social media can cause much harm to a relationship depending on the people participating. It is really up to the people to be mature adults when involving social media in their relationships. It takes trust, responsibility and compromise to really look past all the woes social media can bring to the table.